Rolling projection DOE
Find the projection setup whose median is closest to actual outcomes.
Replay completed anchors and rank horizon × sample-size settings by projection error.
Best rolling setting
3D · n=120
DOE results snapshot · Window: 2026-01-05 → 2026-01-14 · anchors: 32 · latest snapshot: 2026-01-20 · computed at: 2026年7月10日 上午9:38 HKT
DOE setting comparison
Same idea as score-vs-outcome analysis: compare each parameter setting by observed actual-minus-median error over rolling completed anchors. Lower median abs error and lower bias win.
Best setting 3D · n=120: median projection vs actual return
X = Median projection return. Y = actual return. Solid line = linear trend. Orange line = bucket average. Checked: 20 · Pending: 0 · Avg: -0.28%
Best setting 3D · n=120: median projection vs forecast error
X = Median projection return. Y = actual - median. Solid line = linear trend. Orange line = bucket average. Checked: 20 · Pending: 0 · Avg: -0.65%
DOE ranking
Ranked by a composite DOE score: lower median/mean absolute error, lower bias, enough anchors, and better IQR coverage.
| Rank | Horizon | n | Median abs | Mean abs | Bias | Inside P25/P75 | Anchors | DOE score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 3D | 120 | 1.84% | 2.78% | -0.65% | 45% | 20 | 2.678 |